Differences between the F2A and the British Buffalo
[The following was passed along by Jim Maas, who added this note: "There are a couple of differences that are not listed: the clear vision port on the sliding canopy, the pointy tail cone. In addition, there are some items listed about which I haven't got a clue - there's a reference to 'shutters' for the engine, but I keep thinking that means cowling flaps and that's obviously wrong. Anyone got a guess? It's also referenced in the Pilot's Notes Dan already posted."]
Air Commodore Mansell
Dear Air Commodore:
Listed below are the differences
between the Navy F2A-2 and the British 339 E fighters, discussed by Mr. C. R.
Fairey, British Purchasing Commission, the Honorable James Forrestal, Under
Secretary of the Navy, Mr. Phillip Young, Treasury Department, Commander L. E.
Richardson, Bureau of Aeronautics, and representatives of this Company.
1. 1820-G105A
Wright engine
23. None
23. Upper and Lower identification lights
24. None
24. 1 qt. Hand fire extinguisher
25. None
25. Cockpit, windscreen, and wing gun heating
26. Telescopic Gun Sight
26. Reflector Gun Sight
It
is understood that the differences in engines and propellers, items 1 and 2,
were necessary on account of the procurement situation for these items. Items 2, 3, and 4, should be grouped
together in that the differences in the cooling system are due to the fact that
cuffs can not be installed on the Hamilton Standard Propeller. It is understood that the Navy will adopt
the 24 Volt system in future procurement (Item 8). It is understood that the additional battery capacity required by
the British is due to the British radio (Item 9). It is possible that item 13 can be standardized after
investigation. It is called to
attention, however, that considerable weight increase will be involved if the
British fire extinguisher is used.
This Company is now investigating,
in cooperation with the Bureau, a means for providing leak-proof protection for
the fuel and oil tanks (item 14). If a
satisfactory method can be developed, it is probable standardization can be
brought about.
It is understood that the British
are willing to standardize on the cartridge starter (item 15). It is very desirable to standardize on Items
18, 19, 20 and 21, in the event of future procurement.
Development of a dependable double
filament bulb will permit standardization on one landing light (Item 22).
It was agreed the British would
eliminate the hand fire extinguisher thus permitting standardization in item
24.
Investigation may permit
standardization on items 11, 25 and 26.
It was stated by representatives of
the contractor, that any attempt to produce standardization on existing fighter
contracts, would result in delay in deliveries.
Very truly yours.
R.
D. MacCart
RDM:MR
CC: Hon. James
Forrestal
British Purchasing Commission
15 Broad Street
New York City, New York
F2A-2 Navy
Model 339 E British
BREWSTER AERONAUTICAL CORPORATION
By:
Chief
Engineer
Mr. Phillip
Young
Commdr. L.
B. Richardson
Brewster
Export Corp.
Mr. Hardman
Gen. File
Eng. File
Mr. Bird
See the Warbird's Bookshelf